Artificial Armistice Anger

poppy-1447203_640

Today is the 11th November or Armistice day. It’s 99 years since the end of the First World War –  at the time regarded as “the war to end all wars”.

There have, of course, been many other significant wars since, so the intense devastation and huge loss of life did not, alas, lead to the cessation of global hostilities.

I am not especially qualified to discuss the various issues surrounding military conflict – it’s a complex issue. I think most people would agree that war is a bad thing, some people may believe there are times when war is unavoidable, others make take the view that war is never justifiable.

It isn’t for me to comment on really – I have my views, but I don’t believe that my views are sufficiently well-informed to air them on a blog that is, for the most part, meant to be light-hearted and fun.

An in-depth discussion on the morality of war would seem out of place on these pages.

But there is one issue surrounding the Remembrance Day commemorations that often leaves me feeling a little uncomfortable.

It’s the issue of whether to wear or not to wear a poppy.

I have no objections to wearing a poppy myself – it’s a fitting symbol for remembering the fallen from the First World War and it seems a reasonable extension that it should be used to remember the fallen in all world wars.

It’s also reasonable that proceeds from the poppy appeal go towards supporting veterans of more recent conflicts.

I have no intrinsic problem with The Poppy Appeal – indeed I am actively in favour of it in most respects.

However, these days there does seems to be a bizarre notion that anyone who chooses not to wear a poppy is somehow unpatriotic or disrespectful.

Surely, if there is a point to any conflict it is supposedly to maintain our freedom.

And freedom surely means having the choice not to wear a poppy.

It’s a freedom that certain sections of the mainstream media seem to conveniently forget about when constructing artificial outrage.

And such artificial outrage surely flies in the face of what the poppy is supposed to represent.

We should feel free to wear a poppy today, be it as an act of remembrance or to show solidarity with veterans of conflict.

But we should also feel free not to wear a poppy if that is our preference.

To be fair the artificial outrage does not limit itself to non-poppy wearers. Princes William and Harry are on the receiving end of the wrath of one particularly hateful publication today for choosing to go to a rugby game over attending this evening’s Festival of Remembrance at the Royal Albert Hall.

Now I’m certainly no royalist, indeed my feeling about the British Royal Family are firmly indifferent. I mean I’d imagine we’d be more than OK without a Royal Family, but William and Harry are generally inoffensive as it goes.

And to be fair, it seems a particularly odd criticism of military veteran Prince Harry, who is famously quite active in his charity work for veterans of conflict, to suggest he is somehow being disrespectful by not attending an event, which the writer of the article even admits that ‘he may still end up attending after the rugby’.

But what do I know about such things?