It’s Friday, which is the day that, when I can be bothered, I post something that I claim is art, even though it really isn’t.

Even accepting the notion that art is in the eye of the beholder, and that anything can therefore qualify as art, it would be a stretch to claim I’ve actually achieved anything remotely artistic with my ‘Artist’s Corner’ feature.

But today that’s about to change because, ladies and gentlemen of the blogosphere, I give you this masterpiece:

IMG_0095

Now you might claim that all I’ve done here is rip the label off a tin of tomatoes and replaced it with a white self adhesive label onto which I’ve written the word worms.

And you’d be right, that is all I’ve done.

It isn’t an actual can of worms and not even a particularly gullible small child would fall for it. Mrs Proclaims was, nonetheless, a tad apprehensive when I opened the above can earlier this week to make a sea food pasta dish. She ate it but she did eye the squid with a little more suspicion than usual.

But it is art nonetheless, because my ‘can of worms’ is representative of all of the metaphorical ‘cans of worms’ being opened at the moment, all over the world (but often by one man in particular…).

When you think about it I’ve been very very clever here.

Probably the most clever of all the artists.

 

9 thoughts on “Always Read The Label

    1. Actually the original is available although for a limited time only – it’s nestling in my recycling bin at the moment but I believe you only have a few hours before the council comes to empty it. Remember this is a limited time offer so act now!

      Liked by 2 people

  1. Haha, very good. I’m liking this new ‘photo art’ concept! Wasn’t there some cat that was or wasn’t alive in a box, until it was opened? So, potentially, couldn’t it have been an actual can of worms at the point of capturing the image? 🤔

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Shrodinger’s ‘can of worms’. An intriguing concept. But I did remove the previous label which definitely said ‘chopped tomatoes’ so I’m not sure my argument would be as strong as the cat scenario. But art is art so any interpretation is acceptable. In which case it definitely is a ‘can of worms’. Or not.
      I think you might’ve opened up another ‘can of worms’…

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s